هل يلعب الله النرد مع الكون؟ | اينست… |شبكة رائج

Could we be the dice players? This is an invitation to see a theory where light is both a wave and a particle, with a probabilistic future (∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π), continuously unfolding in relation to the electron probability cloud of atoms and the wavelength of light. According to this theory, the wave-particle duality of light and matter (electrons) creates a blank canvas that we can interact with forming a future relative to the energy and momentum of our actions. This interaction is represented by a constant of action in space and time, mathematically denoted as the Planck constant h/2π. This concept is supported by the continuous exchange of light photon energy (∆E=hf) into the kinetic energy (Eₖ=½mv²) of matter, in the form of electrons.

Spoiler: yes. Einstein was wrong

God doesn’t play dice with the universe. The universe plays dice with us and sometimes God loads the dice for us. Pretty simple, oh but you probably have the idea of God indoctrinated out of you.

So what if Einstein was not talking about the god of the bible or of any other religion? Whose says you need a specific religion to address God? Einstein used the term God so obviously he meant God. "God does not play dice with the universe". That's quite a definitive statement if you ask me. So the question is… We understand that an atheist denies God for himself… But why must an atheist deny God for another? Especially if that other one (Einstein in this case) is very clear about what he's saying.

🧿 ⏩ ♾️ …💛 (From Chintu to Einstein and beyond)

What is described here about Einsteins view on Quantum Mechanics are cliches. There is a whole book with the letters exchanged between Einstein and Max Born.
Einstein himself explicitly denied believing in a deterministic world view.
Einstein was not so much concerned about the probabilistic nature of the Quantum world (though the quote is correct) but about what he called "spooky action at a distance" (spukhafte Fernwirkung in German) and what is now called Non-locality. The first time he brought this up was by a thought experiment at the Solvay conference 1927.
It is also a cliche Niels Bohr always found a convincing answer to Einsteins thought experiments. He did sometimes and at other time did not even understand what Einstein aimed at.
There is no scientific consensus on the Kopenhagen interpretation, not now and never was and their disciples could never agree between each other what it meant.
There is only a Kopenhagen mysticism.
Schrödinger like Einstein never agreed to the Kopenhagen views (that is why Schrödinger constructed his famous cat thought experiment) nor did John Bell and many other.
For a more balanced view read the Book of Douglas Stone (Physicist professor at Yale university) : Einstein and the Quantum.

God and the devil are playing chess, with the world as the arena

No, as the Devine Being that Preserves and us the Protector Imagines the Creation being Infinite/Eternal and IS already everywhere and every when at First Awakening of the Reality. I see nothing strange about quantum mechanics nor sub-quantum reality. The Mystery of mysticism is there is no mystery at all if understood which requires pure Rational Intuition to comprehend. I think a doctor Goddard said there is just one electron and neutron where two such neutrons touched one another and the Particle Wave occurred. It's close but no cigar. The Universe and Cosmos are Imagined and each future is selected by the choices each human being Imagines just like the the Reality does as Flow by each extant and potentially imagined partial wave Front agreed upon democratically by all that moves and has never moved as the Flow of Time/ Space now flowing as the Finitely synthesized Illusory Imaged Infinitely in our reality. What is determined is the Best Fit for each Particle as the Flow of Time in Space and the new different Space/Time. Einstein was fixated on a steady state Cosmos and should have determined that the Cosmos and Original Creation was ubiquitous and steady state eons before particles came into existence as Universe of universes, hot and Kinetic and differentiated never extant before. See acedamia.edu for 60 free papers on the subject. So far science barely has a clue.

Also he watched He-Man just like you 90s lot. That's me also. Alan Shearer was the best

Rolled a 7 with 1 die.

God of the Bible doesn't play dice 🤦‍♂️ God knows every outcome. He's beyond our comprehension

Planet? Cigar =Big

Cigarette =Small cigar,

Plane = Big plane

Plane- ette =Small Plane

"Plane" is "Flat." Earth is Flat!! "Airplanes" fly in the "Air" over a "Plane." We live in a pressurized system. YOU CAN'T HAVE AIR PRESSURE WITHOUT A LID AND YES! YOUR METEOROLOGIST IS LYING TO YOU AND YES! YOUR TEACHERS LIED TO YOU!!!

Not bad but still only a classical overview of the history of QM; the main fault is not mentioning the cause for De Broglie's "material" wave interpretation and the plenty of paradoxes arising from it like the "moving" "particle" would have higher energy and then higher frequency (E=hf) but according to Relativity Theory, the effect is the opposite: f'=f(1- (v/c)^2)^ (-1/2)- the consequence of Lorentz formula for the light's source. At the background is a typical physicist's lack of knowledge of the. methodology of his own subject matter (in general: philosophy of science, esp. not distinguishing between a (mathematical)model and the (laboratory) data,here, esp. forgetting that Jacobi-Hamilton mathematical models of "wave" and a "particle" was not a physical "things" but just a model to explain other data of experiments (available only later). Consequently, talking about the wave of a ball or any tiny rigid body (being) is a total para science that forgets that QM is a statistical theory and does not deal with an "object"! More; any statistical (or probability law) is the same deterministic as any classical physics laws but it only deals with the sets of objects. Nothing mysterious here. The name Heisenberg's Uncertainty is a deception and a thought experiment for Heisenberg's microscope is misleading as treating an "electron" as traveling and consequently it suggest His) momentum is a function of speed but that is not the case if the datum is treated as the interaction of a measuring device with a field(wave) that does not move but is standing (on the definition)

Excellent summary

I don't mean to be a class clown but…. 👋ing. Also who knows that Meaningwave exists?

Scientist's in a short ten thousand years from now are going to believe that we (alive now) were ignorant beyond belief 😂

This is the best of YouTube.

I love quantum physics

actually, the universe uses 'god' as a dice.

So it works like this. God created the universe, the big bang. You ask: how? This is how. God created what I call the Expanding Graviton. The expanding graviton has 3 main properties. 1) Gravitons are wave functions. Wave functions have quantum states for momentum/position/energy/spin. 2) Expanding gravitons are the carriers of the physics constants. The difference between superstring mathematics and Expanding gravitons is that Expanding gravitons are endowed with physical existence by virtue of being the carriers of the physics constants. 3) Expanding gravitons are called expanding gravitons because they expand at the speed of light with radius r = speed of light * time. This is the foundation of relativity and was inspired by the time dilation derivation of which critics should familiarize themselves with. When wave functions are part of a quantum system, like the hydrogen wave function, it is because the charges have overcome a very tiny, very neglible amount of energy required to capture the expanding graviton, making it a captured graviton. Dark energy is the graviton "capture" energy of all of the gravitons that exist in the universe, today. Gravitons are continually being created (by events?). The inflationary epoch of the big bang can be explained by the creation of gravitons at an accelerated rate, many orders of magnitude higher than normal. The surface area of an expanding graviton is a virtual photon. So, the Creator created the first graviton. Squeezed it down to an energy E = hf = energy of the big bang. This corresponds to a wavelength of about the diameter of a graviton, lambda = c/f. Lambda = Planck constant*speed of light/energy of the big bang. Energy of the big bang is approximately 10^70 joules. So the wavelength is about 10^ -96 meters which is a lot smaller than the Planck scale. Then, God said, Let there be light. Big bang.