في مقطع الفيديو الأخير الذي ناقشت فيه القارة القطبية الجنوبية القديمة، رأيت عددًا من التعليقات من المشاهدين تخبرني أن خريطة بيري ريس لم تكن الخريطة القديمة الوحيدة التي تظهر القارة القطبية الجنوبية، ونعم، مع القليل من البحث، هناك في الواقع اثنتين أخريين. في هذا الفيديو سألقي نظرة على الفيديو الذي قام بتصويره فيليب بواش، والذي من المفترض أنه تم إنتاجه عام 1739 ويظهر على ما يبدو القارة القطبية الجنوبية خالية من الجليد. لقد أظهرت في مقطع الفيديو الأخير الخاص بي كيف أن خريطة بيري ريس تظهر على الأرجح الشكل المنحرف لأمريكا الجنوبية، وليس القارة القطبية الجنوبية، وأعتقد أن هذا يصبح أكثر وضوحًا كلما نظرت إليها، ولكن ماذا عن هذه الخريطة الأخرى؟ شاهد الفيديو لمعرفة المزيد وما إذا كان تشارلز هابجود على حق – حيث يمكن أن تكون هذه خريطة أخرى للقارة القطبية الجنوبية الخالية من الجليد، والتي أنشأتها حضارة قديمة مفقودة. جميع الصور مأخوذة من صور Google ومن المصادر أدناه للأغراض التعليمية فقط. مصادر:
|شبكة رائج
41 تعليق
Past 1,000 subs on the new Gaming Channel. Thanks if you’ve subbed. This is a video of Super Mario Bros from the NES, which you might like if you’re my age! https://youtu.be/vgB7Jbf6QrA
To further that point about the sea in Antarctica Phillip did name that sea "The Sea of Glaciers"
I thought radar mapping of under ice land features had been done I. The 60s…
Pretty sure we know exactly what the land mass under the ice looks
Like.
Nonsense. The map is real and correct of course.
The ice cap was in another place…
This guys accent is god awful. He sounds like he's announcing the entrance of the king at a ball.
The first sign that this wasn't even vaguely accurate is that the orientation of the inland sea is out by 90 degrees when compared to a modern map of an iceless Antarctica. Whilst I'm sure that there might be errors in mapping some of the finer details of the coastline, getting things that much wrong really should have been a red flag.
Sorry, but I think you missed the point. Its not about how Antarktis would look like now but how it looked before the Ice.
Oh, COME ON!!! This is driving me nuts! You're right; neither the Piri Reis nor the Buache map show anything even remotely like Antarctica. BUT! The Oronce Fine map of 1531 does, regardless of the absolute nonsense the Bad Archeology website peddles. Worse, the entry about OF and his map is a direct steal from other sources that never bothered to research the map. So, basically BS on his/their arguments.
Long story short, just prior to the Younger Dryas, the was a period called the Bolling Allerod, when temperatures shot up from the Ice Age deep freeze to temps very close to today's average. Over a 500 year period, the ice rebounds would not have been very dramatic (maybe a rise in a few dozen meters at most, not hundreds), and the coast line would have been similar to what we have today at and below the ice-shelves. Besides, there are over 60 points of correspondence between the OF map and what we know of the "real" Antarctica.
I really like your presentations, but on this particular subject, I have a very large stick up my a**. The OF map proves nothing, but it is a fascinating artifact of the past that deserves much more honest interest and scrutiny than it has ever received. Too many "main line" researchers dismiss it without really studying it, and too many "crackpots" use the Reis map as proof, when it nothing of the kind.
Flat earth proof
Land of Frost , That took the Flood Waters .
Enochs place until …..
What a dry and superficial commentary, purposely and completely missing the point.
The idea has nothing to do with the "exact" depiction down to the mm of Antarctica. The point is we have a map from 1513 depicting a continent only discovered in 1890. And it's not a continuation of the south american coast, obviously, for most. Furthermore, it was reviewed by Lt Cornel Cmd Harold Z. Ohlmeyer of the USAF Technical Reconnaissance Squadron who was of the same opinion, a man's who's job is to literally recognise land masses.
Then there's Philippe buache's map, who again, depicts a continent that should not exist and you imply it might be guesswork? How many people accurately guessed continental coasts and continents? Really? Insinuating such things is ridiculous and stupid to be frank.
Adding fuel to fire, there aren't just 2, but 4 old maps based on ancient source maps depicting antartica: the Oronteus Finaeus map of 1531 and the famous cartographer Mercator's 1569 map.
All depicting a continent that shouldnt exist. Also featuring the west american coast with mountains that were not yet discovered.
And you would rule this out as coincidence?
That would be not only ignorant, but blatantly stupid.
How about the FINAEUS 1531 map?
Crust rebound is still going on especially in Norway and Sweden. Good video BTW!
Tekeli-li!!! TEKELI-LI!!!!
Have you seen this guys videos on NZ?
https://youtu.be/gmbD5O4ovl4
i personaly want to thank you for the truth
What kind of English you speaking brother? Northern UK probably.
Piri reis map forces on the western coast of africa, the eastern coast of south america, and the northern coast of Antarctica. You obviously don't know shit
Antarctica is the moon. Sounds insane, but explains everything.
What if the ice had melted due to a devasting solar event? (I know nothing about glacier formations and time needed)
Hi – you mention nobody knows what Antarctica would look like without the ice, which I can agree with. You also discuss the continental rebound, and changes in sea level were the ice to have melted. I have read that South America has risen some thousands of feet – that lake Titicaca was once at sea level. If you look at the farming terraces in Machu Pichu they would have been quite workable at a lower altitude, but precious few edible plants grow at that high altitude. If I recall the Piri Reis also shows the land bridge between Russia and Alaska. Perhaps the depths of the sea floor, the altitude of the continents was much different back at the Younger Dryas? That could explain part of the mystery.
I honestly feel sorry for people sucked in by Hapgood, Von Daniken, Hancock and co. John Anthony West is another historical BS artist.
do you even listen to how you read.. the inflection for each sentence is exactly the same and incredibly annoying. vary tour tone for the love of god…
And the saga continues on the frozen continent…
This is very interesting! I never thought about the shape of the land being subject to so many possible variables if the ice were gone.
Thank you! Take care and be safe! 😊💕💕💕
So the sea levels would rise if the ice was removed but the land mass would also rise possibly up to 3000 meters?Is that like a double negative in mathematics?Cancelling each other out? As a solution to the crustal equilibrium problem and the sea levels also,might it be possible that a polar shift occurred far more recently than what is currently theorised?This would allow for this maps accuracy to be at least a little bit of a possibility.
We could fill lakes back up with the glaciers!
Or we could drop some in Arizona right now! Its hot!
Whatt…?! Antartica can rise 3000 meters at ertain point if the ice has melted away…wow, that is incredible..
How’s about an investigation into this?
https://youtu.be/WCwDNGnu8oE
Ancient Architects … Info for you. I found two videos (not mine) and thought they might interest you.
Check out this guy making holes in granite. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqUBjJdytwM
Also you might have seen this one, but thought id send it too. Theory of how the ancients built
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znQk_yBHre4
make an expriment, fill a glass with water and ice and see what happens with the water level when the ice melts.
Weak sauce mate. I like & respect your attitude to stay true to the evidence & not allure to the fantasy for convenient views. There's too many accuracies to ignore. Guessing there was a land mass there was one hell of a swing seeing as we've only discovered this with modern radar, then to get the topography that close? You can't do that with guesswork & theory.
Loved it. I really like old maps and find them interesting. Cheers young Matt.
Please note that the most important thing Pharaohs Got from The ancient land of Punt was Frankincense, and Somalia still produces world's most frankincense!!! Please note this! Thank you
yea you always make yourself sound reasonable but sometimes your skeptic view points actually go as far as the conspiracy people. I appreciate your viewpoint but grain of salt.
I was there the other day, tropical paradise.
I reckon the land beneath the Antarctic ice sheet isn't so much fragmented, as it is distorted. If the estimate of 3000m of isostatic depression is even close to accurate then just imagine how different the ice free topography would be. It is very possible that what shows up on that sonar is only the higher altitudes and with an isostatic rebound of 3km most of that fragmentation is just valleys. Deep valleys but still uninterrupted land.
I don't know either. A fake map is a possibility . One of the keys to a good fraud is to make what people are looking for. Old map makers deliberately made spacial , detail and false topography errors to identify fakes and stolen map intelligence .
The cairngorms is still rising???
Love all your work but why think Antarctica rise so quick ??❤❤
The land depicted on the Philippe Buache map is the hypothetical continent "Terra Australis Incognita" (unknown southern land). One of the first proponents of the existence of such a land mass was the Greek geographer Ptolemy in the 2nd century AD. The existence of Terra Australis was not based on direct observation, but on the idea that continental land in the Northern Hemisphere should be "balanced" by an equal land mass in the Southern Hemisphere. This theory of balancing land has been documented as early as the 5th century (see for example the Macrobius map), and this hypothetical continent appeared on many maps between the 15th and 18th centuries.
Examples are: Guillaume Le Testu's map from 1566 (Cosmographie Universel), Gerard de Jode's map from 1578 (Universi Orbis seu Terreni Globi) and a map from Jacques de Vaux from 1583 (Terre Australle) just to name a few.
Over the centuries the idea of Terra Australis was gradually forgotten due to new discoveries made by Jacob le Maire, Abel Tasman and James Cook.
+1 … but it sounds like you are unaware that many people believe (correctly) that establishment experts have become increasingly untrustworthy since about 1950. It is now necessary to vet each one individually as if they were just some blogger.
Imagine the thousands of maps of ancient planet Earth that burned in the Library of Alexandria. Some say the human knowledge was set back 3000 years because of all the knowledge lost that day. I don't doubt most of today's questions and speculations had their answers somewhere in that Library